- If Michelle Rhee doesn't want uppity bloggers casting aspersions on her students' results, maybe she shouldn't have offered so many contrary reports of same.
- And if she just now noticed those uppity bloggers, she really needs a better Google alert on her name. I think the Daily Howler commented on the issue four or five years ago.
- We need to move away from the idea that diagnosis is in itself a negative. Locally, maybe the move toward inclusion will do this. But right now, we are ignoring students' needs in the name of not labeling learners. Given the dark and racist history of SFUSD's special education referrals, it's an admirable impulse. But some students have real needs. These needs can often be ameliorated in the classroom, but they won't be if they aren't named and teachers aren't given support in doing so.
- For instance, I know some things about sensory processing issues. I can generally offer support to students who need tactile feedback, proprioceptive development, etc. But there is far more I don't know and therefore can't support. When we can't assess students who are struggling for special needs, how can I serve those students well?
- In short: learning differences are differences, and differences are good. Diversity makes us richer, not poorer.
- Ms. Rhee's Cult of the Teacher plays into this, too. If the teacher is the driver of all student achievement or lack thereof, then he or she - if truly motivated - needs no support or guidance to reach all learners. If he or she would just work harder, everything would be easier.
- Of course, the thoughts of anyone who duct-taped students' mouths closed on any issue in education should be taken with a veritable Bonneville of salt.
My punishment for years of running with scissors: teaching today's scissor marathoners.
Even without the Daily Howler's early commentaries on Rhee's bogus "miracle" test score claims, anyone who actually believed her is truly too naive to be allowed out of the house without a babysitter.
ReplyDeleteWhat kind of underlying assumptions do reporters have when they are so willing to buy "90% of students above the 90th percentile" or whatever her specific claim was?
ReplyDeleteAt least one of them is a low opinion of the non-Rhee, non-TFA people infesting America's classrooms.