The District's K, 6th, and 9th placement letters were to be mailed out on Friday, which would mean that they would start showing up in mailboxes Saturday. I am not by nature a conspiracy theorist and I feel confident that the letters got mailed on Friday, but apparently none were received yesterday.
(I hope that this inspires action on behalf of the United States Postal Service; between the hiring freeze, the concerted effort to destroy USPS and public worker pensions in one go, and the enormous budget cuts, it is no wonder that our local postal workers couldn't sort and deliver 14,000 extra letters in less than twenty four hours.)
This will actually make my Monday easier, since the Monday after Enrollment Letter Saturday often brings a number of unscheduled tours to my Kindergarten. Invariably, I forget about this and schedule some extraordinarily messy project and end up answering parent questions while begrimed.
(Which reminds me: families, never tour schools during the last week in May. This seems to be popular at several southeast side schools. Last year, some families came by just as the chicks were moving out of the classroom - leaving a messy and suspiciously empty brooder behind them - and shortly before we embarked on our abstract expressionist painting project, an experience so messy that I bagged the kids' shoes before we started last year.)
That said, I am reminded again that while teachers have strict timelines, no one else does. Classroom teachers have to be ready the first day of school; out of classroom teachers - who are paid for the same in-service days teachers are - do not need to worry about this, since they can set up their rooms after the start of school and begin student services after a couple of weeks. I do not think it is too much to ask EPC to get their data report out on March 15. I recognize that they are very busy and could probably use more staff; I am also very busy and could use additional support. But I still must get all my assessments finished and uploaded by the deadline.
I also find it interesting that SFUSD is embarking on a project to upgrade its technology and infrastructure. I certainly hope this will include a change of policy in school budgeting. Presently, all technology must be purchased out of school site budgets; there is no central funding. Given that technology is required in the Common Core standards, this has to become a centrally-budgeted item. Central budgeting would be helpful anyway because it would mean a simpler infrastructure to maintain. (I believe that schools must purchase certain types of computers, but everyone I know gets their technology by grant or pocketbook, and that means lots of different operating systems.)