So I enjoy opportunities for outside items that raise my ire, like this nonsense in the New York Times. Briefly:
- As a teacher, I would be opening myself to serious discipline by suggesting a child be assessed for ADHD.
- So I find it suspicious that the teacher in the article did not only suggest the above, but also turned directly toward medication.
- Indeed, the way the author recounts the tale suggests the teacher was more interested in control than any actual needs of the child.
- I note with interest that the author tells us she took her child to an "upper East side of Manhattan psychiatrist."
- This leads me to believe that the author's son was enrolled at a private, competitive school.
- So in addition to doubting the existence of the teacher (did she receive a bonus from Shire or similar for every prescription?), I have to wonder to what extent the parent's desires for her child impacted her decision to medicate him.
- As someone who spends at least the majority of each year taking ADHD medications, I take offense to the author's conclusion that medication is only really necessary when teachers suck.
- In comments on a blog post about the article, readers recount teachers diagnosing their children in Kindergarten.
- ADHD is rarely if ever diagnosed in such young children by anyone at any time.
- Teachers are generally aware of the criteria for diagnosis because parents ask about ADHD with some frequency.
- Therefore, I doubt the veracity of these drug-pushing Kindergarten teachers.
No comments:
Post a Comment