And little did I think Michelle Rhee would provide it. Her statement on the murders at Sandy Hook Elementary was grotesque. And she was forced to issue yet another statement noting that while Students First helped put a number of no unions, extra guns adherents into the Michigan State Legislature, that didn't mean she supported guns in schools.
But then I discovered that Rhee will be publishing a
And that screed's title? Is Radical.
And why is it so titled? Because apparently Michelle Rhee believes that:
- Working closely with Republicans and conservative Democrats
- Accepting large amounts of corporate money to lobby for corporate policy
- General anti-unionism
- Aligning oneself with major foundations of conservative bent and ALEC
- Instituting top-down, secretive management in school districts
- Shoddy budgeting and shadowy finances
- Laudatory coverage in The Atlantic
are radical actions and events.
In essence, because Rhee associates herself with wealthy and connected interests in education reform, and apparently doing so is radical.
I mean, I suppose that given what the average teacher makes, her speaking fees are pretty radical. But I don't think this is the radical behavior to which her title refers. No, I think Rhee views herself as a lonely crusader for the children, fighting against a vast army of unionbot teachers and their reactionary love of collective bargaining and small class sizes and pensions.
And Rhee's self-concept is about the funniest thing I've ever heard. I suppose I could get angry at her abuse of nouns, but this is the equivalent of handing a Kindergartner a mirror for a self-portrait assessment and getting a fabulous picture of a firefighting robot with flight capability (this happens). The difference is that the five year old is five and creative; Michelle Rhee is a college-educated woman in her 40s and she still sees that robot in the mirror.